论文目录 | |
Acknowledgements | 第1-5页 |
Abstract (Chinese) | 第5-7页 |
Abstract (English) | 第7-12页 |
Chapter One Introduction | 第12-15页 |
· Background and Purpose of this Study | 第12-14页 |
· Organization of this Thesis | 第14-15页 |
Chapter Two Literature Review | 第15-36页 |
· Definition of Culture | 第15页 |
· Edward T. Hall’s Cultural Context Model | 第15-18页 |
· America as a Low-Context and Mono-Chronic Culture | 第17-18页 |
· China as a High-Context and Poly-Chronic Culture | 第18页 |
· Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions | 第18-25页 |
· Power Distance | 第19-20页 |
· Uncertainty Avoidance | 第20-21页 |
· Individualism and Collectivism | 第21-22页 |
· Masculinity and Femininity | 第22-23页 |
· Long- Versus Short-term Orientation | 第23-24页 |
· Indulgence versus Restraint | 第24-25页 |
· Trompenaars’Seven Dimensions of Culture | 第25-26页 |
· Robert House et al.’s GLOBE Study | 第26-30页 |
· A Brief Review of Existing Intercultural Study of Media’s Coverage on Disasters | 第30-36页 |
Chapter Three Rationale and Methodology | 第36-40页 |
· The Main Research Question | 第36页 |
· Research Sources and Materials | 第36-37页 |
· Methodology | 第37-40页 |
Chapter Four Cultural Differences between China Daily and the New York Times’H1N1 Coverage | 第40-67页 |
· High-Context vs. Low-Context | 第40-43页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology | 第40-41页 |
· Language in Report: Monotonous (China Daily) vs. Vivid (the New York Times) | 第41-42页 |
· Visual Presentation: Less (China Daily) vs. More (the New York Time) | 第42-43页 |
· Mono-chronic vs. Poly-chronic | 第43-45页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology | 第43-44页 |
· Respond Time to H1N1: Slow (China Daily) vs. Prompt (the New York Times) | 第44-45页 |
· Power Distance | 第45-51页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第45-46页 |
· Attention to Vulnerable Group of People: Little (China Daily) vs.Much(the New York Times) | 第46-48页 |
· Attitudes towards Authority and Experts: Strong and Positive (China Daily) vs. Weak and Critical (the New York Times) | 第48-51页 |
· Uncertainty Avoidance | 第51-55页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第51-52页 |
· Promptness, Amount, Style and Sources of Report: Slow, Fewer and Monotonous (China Daily) vs. Swift, Abundant and Balanced (the New York Times) | 第52-55页 |
· Individualism vs. Collectivism | 第55-60页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第55页 |
· Focus of Report and Visual Image: State and Society as a Whole (China Daily) vs. Individual (the New York Times) | 第55-60页 |
· Femininity vs. Masculinity | 第60-61页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第60页 |
· Portrayal of Government and Society: Caring and Humane (China Daily)vs. Impassive (the New York Times) | 第60-61页 |
· Short Term and Long Term Orientation | 第61-64页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第62页 |
· Depth of Coverage: Shallow (China Daily) vs. Thorough (the New York Times) | 第62-64页 |
· Indulgence vs. Restraint | 第64-67页 |
· Hypotheses and Methodology for Analysis | 第65页 |
· Reportage Concerning Leisure Activities: Few (China Daily) vs. Plenty(the New York Times) | 第65-67页 |
Chapter Five Conclusion | 第67-71页 |
· Summary of this Study | 第67-68页 |
· Proposals for Chinese Media’s Disaster Reportage Targeting Foreign Audiences | 第68-69页 |
· Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study | 第69-71页 |
Appendix 1 Data of China Daily’s H1N1 Report on Visual Presentation, Style as well as Attitude towards Authority and Expert | 第71-78页 |
Appendix 2 Data of the New York Times’H1N1 Report on Visual Presentation, Styleas well as Attitude towards Authority and Expert | 第78-87页 |
References | 第87-91
页 |